Se prendre d’amitié pour

The recent Woody Allen movie, Midnight in Paris illustrated the importance of Gertrude Stein on the avant-garde world of Paris in the 1920s. There is a major art exhibit Matisse, Cezanne. Picasso… The Stein Family that explores the relationship between Gertrude, Leo, Michael, and Sarah Stein and the artists and writers they befriended. The exhibit just finished in San Francisco and will open at the Grand Palais in Paris on October 5 and remain until January 16, 2012. From there, it will continue to The Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York from February to June 3, 2012.

English: Image of Gertrude Stein and Jack Hemi...

English: Image of Gertrude Stein and Jack Hemingway in Paris, 1924. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Gertrude and her brother Leo shared a house just around the corner from Michael and his wife Sarah in the 6th Arrondissement, next to the Jardin de Luxembourg. There, they entertained Picasso, Matisse, Cezanne as well as fellow American expatriates Ernest Hemingway, author Sherwood Anderson, and F. Scott Fitzgerald. The Steins were among the first to buy art that others reviled and that proved to be a great investment.

Today’s expression, se prendre d’amitié pour (suh prawndruh dam-i-tea-ay poor), means “to befriend” or “to take up with.” The Stein’s friendship and financial patronage was an important part of the artistic process for many of the 20th century’s most significant artists and writers. I can see why Gil, Owen Wilson’s character in the movie, enjoyed hanging out with Gertrude Stein and cronies so much. I wouldn’t object to a little time travel to the apartment on rue de Fleurus myself.

Midnight in Paris

Advertisements

About Patricia Gilbert

Patricia Gilbert is a French teacher. She's Canadian, lives in the United States, but dreams of living in France. Follow her on Instagram @Onequalitythefinest and on Twitter @1qualthefinest.
This entry was posted in Art, Events, Travel and tagged , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Se prendre d’amitié pour

  1. Dhiraj says:

    Yes Midnight in Paris was one of the better outings of Woody Allen. Picasso and matisse always interest me and Steins were critical in both their successes.
    Picasso breaks many canons of the artistic tradition with his ferocity and distortion but he is dependent on viewer. He is trying to establish a dialogue with her, though from an offensive, brazen and violent perch. The Dance, on the other hand, is self contained. It is a scene that stands on its own, its own energy, its own joy, its own ecstasy. This is a private revelry whose link with the viewer is tenuous.
    http://modernartists.blogspot.com/2011/10/review-of-matisses-dance-vis-vis.html

  2. Dhiraj says:

    Great Blog Pgilbert. I have added you on my blogroll.
    Thanks

  3. Pingback: Il y a des fleurs partout pour qui veut bien les voir | One quality, the finest.

  4. Pingback: Faire le pont | One quality, the finest.

  5. Pingback: Une Tache aveugle | One quality, the finest.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s